follow us on twitter and facebook follow us on facebook follow us on Google+ follow us on twitter follow us on LinkedIn
Download DNLeBooks.com toolbar
A Matter of Interpretation Federal Courts and The Law
 
 
 
 
A Matter of Interpretation Federal Courts and The Law by Antonin Scalia
 
USD 23.95
 
A Matter of Interpretation Federal Courts and The Law
Antonin Scalia
Available on Windows Available on Android
View in Browser
Download Standalone
Preview
Get DNL Reader
To view the Standalone version, you require the installation of the small file size DNL Reader. To get the DNL Reader, click the "Get DNL Reader" button.
To view the Standalone version, you require the installation of the small file size EPP Reader. To get the EPP Reader, click the "Get EPP Reader" button.
To view the eBook you require the installation of the reader from Android Market to get the reader. click the "Get DNL Reader" button.
 
Share this  
 
 
Downloads : 412
File Size : 433.71 K
 
 
Publisher : Princeton University Press
 
Imprint : Princeton University Press
ISBN : 9781400822171
 
 
 
 
  Overview  
 

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim--"distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal--good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals.

This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints.

 
 
Get DNL Reader, itís free.
Create your own eBook
Download ePageWiz
 
Princeton.eBook.com
 
site map  |   home  |   contact  |   contact  |   terms and conditions  |   privacy policy
   
  © 2014  DNAML  DNAML  
Other eBook Stores:  -  dnlebooks.com  -  Enter4books.com  -  Loveebooks.com  -  romance.dnlebooks.com  -  cleverbooks.com  -  ebookauthors.com  -  ebookmafia.com
spacer
spacer